This is majorly because they are able to live comfortable life and earn a living from their talents. This according to the celebrities does not require any straining reading from the books but hard work, persistence and focus.For example, for an individual to be able to play a certain type of sport, such as basketball, very little education is needed.
“Anti-Intellectualism: Why We Hate the Smart Kids” Penrod suggests that scholar are disliked in part because of the “opinion that alarm for grades and test scores excludes the coexistence of normal social activities – and that this becomes a “self-fulfilling prophecy; ‘nerds’ are excluded from social activity because of their label, and that label in turn intensifies through the resulting lack of social contact.” Do you agree? I conquer with Penrod when he suggests that most scholars are disliked in the society because of referring to themselves as smart kids.
This is because scholars only view their smartness from a centralized point of view, acquiring knowledge from books.
The person can only be ranked as the best of all the rest at this point if his or her results are positive.
For this reasons, it is wrong to refer to one as being perfect or smart because of the good grades obtained from examination tests.
In what ways does this rule complicate the notion that media violence in some way causes youth violence?
The “rule of the real” is related to the youths basic on the facts that not all youths riots and violation are caused by the media.Several aspects about the person should be recorded in a list and then followed by a strategic analysis which will show if the individual performs better in each of the aspects.The analysis should be in a logical and systematic manner after which the results can be compared to other members of the society.Youths can still violet to the mistreatment they undergo without the influence of the media (Paul & Marzilli 47). What reasons does she give to support her claim, and does she convince you?For instance, youths found in remote areas where there is no direct assess to the media still violet and riot for their rights and force their parents or the society to implement their desire. If not, do you at least a ccept her argument as plausible?The important factor to them is the scoring and the good coordination with the other team members, this is what makes them famous and earn a living and not spending their entire life straining to acquire more knowledge from the books which is not applicable in the real life.Part 2 “Whodunit-The Media” Question 1 “The rule of the real,” Cutler writes, “says that however strong media influences may be, real life is stronger.” How does the “rule of the real” relate to youth violence?I agree with Penrod that the success of celebrities is partly responsible for anti intellectual since most of the popular celebrities especially those that practice different sport and music have very little education that they might have acquired from school.However, these celebrities are far much better in their lifestyle as compared to scholar who have gone to school and are still involving their entire life with reading more books.As Penrod writes, “the fact that such a vital public figure [President Bush] can get away with saying things like ‘It’s clearly a budget.It’s got a lot of numbers in it,’ and ‘There needs to be a wholesale effort against racial profiling, which is illiterate children’ reflects rather poorly on the regard on which most Americans hold intelligence.” (693) This leads young students to ponder such detrimental questions such as, “if Christina Aguilera can be rich and famous without finishing high school, why can’t I?