It must also be said that, regardless of what one thinks of the man’s writing, Mc Carthy belongs to a small corpus of postmodern stylists who have eschewed all of the blandishments of fame, shunning the limelight and remaining publicly indifferent to all the encomiums showered on his work.Tags: Ib Extended Essay Contents PageFormal Letter For Application SpmResearch Paper CartoonsEssay Writing Referencing StylesEssay On What Makes A Good FriendResearch Paper Assignment Guidelines
propos[ing] instead to read its violence as the result of a metaphysical yearning for meaning to brace us against the fear of the unknown.” (IBID) The problem with the character of the Judge, though (the main antagonist in this fatalist epic) is that while he may be, for Dorson, a symbol for “a metaphysical yearning for meaning to brace us against the fear of the unknown,” he is not believable as a character; he is merely a cipher for the philosophical pontification that Dorson mistakes for profound meaning.
Being as this was my first time reading one of my books in public, before a crowd, I was quite anxious.
I felt that I did reasonably well in my performance (selecting a chapter from one of my earlier, hardboiled crime novels, Rolling Country).
The book is just a narratively slack catalogue of abuses.
According to James Dorson, in his article Demystifying the Judge: Law and Mythical Violence in Cormac Mc Carthy’s Blood Meridian: “Since its publication in 1985, the extreme scenes of violence in Cormac Mc Carthy’s Blood Meridian have posed a central problem for critics.” (105).