Tags: Write Dissertation HypothesisImportance Of Critical Thinking Skills In EducationCover Letter ReceptionistEssay Title Italics Or QuotesCreative Writing Competitions For High School Students UkCompleted HomeworkEssay About Transplants OrgansDissertation Globalisation Financiere
It is important however that we do not lose sight of the large number of people who are terminally ill and have found richness and purpose in life despite the pain and hardship.A survey published by the British Medical Journal in 2011 found that the majority of patients who are almost completely paralysed but fully conscious have said they are happy and do not want to die. Some believe that every patient has a right to choose when to die. We do not have to kill the patient to kill the symptoms. Opening the doors to voluntary euthanasia could lead to non-voluntary and involuntary euthanasia, by giving doctors the power to decide when a patient’s life is not worth living. Reports from the Netherlands, where euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are legal, reveal that doctors do not always report it. The assumption that patients should have a right to die would impose on doctors a duty to kill, thus restricting the autonomy of the doctor.
Euthanasia: Legalizing in all states and causes Euthanasia which is also known as “Mercy Killing” is very popular nowadays.
It is ending of life to be relieved from difficult sufferings.
Another recent study found that nurses are regularly euthanasing their patients in Belgium even though the laws prohibits it.
Since euthanasia was legalised in 2002 there has not been one attempt to prosecute for abuses of the euthanasia law.
Shouldn’t patients have the right to end their lives?
Supporters of euthanasia believe that allowing people to ‘die with dignity’ is kinder than forcing them to continue their lives with suffering. In the Netherlands in 1990 around 1,000 patients were killed without their request. Also, a ‘right to die’ for some people might well become a ‘duty to die’ by others, particularly those who are vulnerable or dependent upon others. The pro-euthanasia and assisted suicide lobby emphasise the importance of personal choice and autonomy.The survey took in 40 OECD and non-OECD countries, including the USA, the Netherlands, Germany and France.Changing the law to allow euthanasia or assisted suicide will inevitably put pressure on vulnerable people to end their lives for fear of being a financial, emotional or care burden upon others.Dr Andrew Fergusson, of the Care Not Killing Alliance, has said Studies concerning the euthanasia and assisted suicide law in countries that have legalised such measures make for troubling reading.A study conducted in 2012 shows that 32% of the assisted deaths in Belgium are carried out without request and 47% of assisted deaths go unreported in the Flanders region of Belgium.The survey questioned 168 members of the French Association for Locked-in Syndrome.Matthew Hampson was a promising young rugby player until a collapsing scrum left him paralysed from the neck down and requiring a ventilator to breathe.Dignity in Dying patron, Sir Patrick Stewart has argued Surely however the debate is not about the right to die; it is about the right to help patients kill themselves. Euthanasia and assisted suicide are matters of public concern because they involve one person facilitating the death of another.Instead of giving freedom to patients, euthanasia and assisted suicide is about giving other people the legal power to end another person’s life. Friends, relatives, healthcare staff and society are hugely affected by the wider ramifications of the process.This would especially affect people who are disabled, elderly, sick or depressed.Some would face the added risk of coercion by others who might stand to gain from their deaths.