In order to fulfill their security mandate and with respect for human rights and the rule of law, States have a reserved right and responsibility of taking effective counter-terrorism measures, to stop and avert future attacks from terrorists and to bring to book those that are responsible for these acts.However, measures taken by States to counter terrorism present serious challenges to the fostering and protection of human rights.Both international and states’ human rights laws highlight that, in exclusive situations, States wield positive power to take precautionary operational measures to protect individuals or groups whose lives are known (or suspected) to be in danger due to unlawful acts of other individuals or groups-these of course includes terrorists.Tags: Solving Math Problems With ExponentsPeople To Do Research Papers OnSolving Complex ProblemsDarul Arqam HomeworkI Need Help Creating A Thesis StatementHistory Of Body Modification EssaysSalem Witch Trials Research PaperThesis On Hotel Management System
This is where states are obligated to ensure that human rights of their nationals are protected against threats of terrorism.
Therefore they ensure that the perpetrators of acts of terrorism are brought to justice.
As the former UN secretary general stated, “We should all be clear that there is no trade-off between effective action against terrorism and the protection of human rights On the contrary, I believe that, in the long term, we shall find that human rights, along with democracy and social justice, are one of the best prophylactics against terrorism.” Thus, the responsibility of States’ to protect individuals and groups within their jurisdiction together with all other undertaken in combating terrorism must be in tune with their obligations as stipulated in the international law, notably international human rights law, humanitarian law and refugee law.
In retrospect, in the same way terrorism negatively affects human rights, counter terrorism measures adopted by States too affect human rights.
This paper researches on terrorism and counter-terrorism in the context of human rights.
It puts the real scenario of how victims and perpetrators of terrorism are treated (or should be treated) with regard to fundamental aspects of human rights.Consequently, the respect for human rights and the rule of law has lacked its meaning in international fight against terrorism.What this mean is that, there is an urgent need to create national or even international counter-terrorism strategies that are not only intended to detect and prevent terrorism, and/or bring those responsible for these gross acts to book but they should also foster and protect human rights and the basic rule of law.In particular, Member States have unambiguously agreed that terrorism: is a threat to the dignity and primary security of individuals and groups globally, puts the lives of innocent civilians in danger, creates a fearful environment, endangers fundamental freedoms, and violate human rights and the rule of law.In addition, terrorism is strongly linked to organized crimes such as money laundering, drug and human trafficking as well as illegal proliferation of nuclear, biological and chemical materials.The essays below were written by students to help you with your own studies.If you are looking for help with your essay then we offer a comprehensive writing service provided by fully qualified academics in your field of study.In summary, due attention should be directed to the victims of whose human rights have been violated, this can be done through compensation and even restitution.Human rights are regarded as universal principles and legal value that are created to guarantee the protection of individuals as well as groups against measures and exclusions of State agents that are contrary to their fundamental rights, freedoms and dignity.Such measures should be directed towards the conducive factors that promote terrorism, these includes; the absence of basic rule of law, ethnic tensions, political extremisms, economic and religious discrimination, and most importantly the violation of human rights.With this in mind, the consequences would be to encourage active leadership and participation of the civil society in the fight against terrorism, the condemnation of human rights violations, and the prohibition of those who commit such acts in the context of natural law.