It is possible to compare the intention to ban tobacco with the prohibition of alcohol by federal law.Therefore, a ban on tobacco would not be an effective way to reduce the number of smokers.Nicotine can stay in the body for up to eight hours a day.
It is possible to compare the intention to ban tobacco with the prohibition of alcohol by federal law.Therefore, a ban on tobacco would not be an effective way to reduce the number of smokers.Nicotine can stay in the body for up to eight hours a day.Tags: Psu Masters Thesis SubmissionHalloween Essay PaperCtel Exam Essay QuestionsHistory Of Gaming EssayHow To Conduct A Business PlanEssays Othello IagoExplication Essay ExampleIf I Could Change The World EssayEssay On Substance Abuse In The Workplace
The matter is that the establishment of laws against smoking will cause an increase in activity in the black market, which will spread the tobacco products illegally.
Such prevention would create the prosperity of criminal organizations, such as the mafia and other illegal gangs, making a profit from selling tobacco, alcohol, and other illicit substances to people.
The Dangers of Smoking Smoking has a very negative impact on the health of people and causes serious long-term and short-term health problems for both the smoker and non-smoker. Today, many people still smoke knowing the fact that it can lead to seious heatlh problems and also possibly death.
Smoking has been around since the beginning of time.
As a result, a ban on smoking will not result in the prevention of smoking, but rather create profitable terms for the development of the black market.
There is an example of the unsuccessful attempt from the government to stop the spread of alcohol.
The first cigarettes were hand-rolled, until the United Advertising and promotion also plays an important role.
It attracts more people into smoking and also promotes a glamourous image of smoking.
The issue is that cigarette smoking is a mass phenomenon around the world and has raised the degree of epidemics due to the number of smokers.
It is noteworthy to claim that the prevalence of smoking often relates to the cheap and mass-produced manufacturing of cigarettes.