Conclude by providing some insight into the relationship between the central topic of the literature review and a larger area of study such as a discipline, a scientific endeavor, or a profession.For further information see our handouts on Writing a Critical Review of a Nonfiction Book or Article or Reading a Book to Review It.To be specific, this method is perfect for historiographical works and other reviews that are focused more on the investigation methodology or on how the specific issue were developing over time.
I have integrated some other tips within this guide, particularly in suggesting different technology tools that you might want to consider in helping you organize your review.
In the sections from Step 6-9 what I have included is the outline of those steps exactly as described by Galvan.
This method of data organization is based on grouping different literature sources by their topic and theoretic concept in an order, defined by their relevance and importance. Many people insist that writing a review using this form of organization rather than a chronological one, helps a student make his review stronger because it requires you to analyze topics, theories, and concepts that are vital for your investigation. However, it will be wise to place the categories in a sequence starting from the most significant (broad) ones to those that are more specific to keep it clear and understandable.
It also requires you to include the explanation of why certain sources are linked to each other, which is usually done by means of providing a relevant title to every category. If you prefer to stick to a chronological method of data organization, you have to list your sources in a chronological order, for example, the date when each source was published. However, in some cases, it can be more appropriate.
The format of a review of literature may vary from discipline to discipline and from assignment to assignment.
A review may be a self-contained unit — an end in itself — or a preface to and rationale for engaging in primary research.and its main purpose is to collect all the relevant sources of information and organize them in a logical sequence.This part of a dissertation should also make an evaluation of all available sources and find the gaps in existing knowledge on a particular topic in order to create a reasoned ground for research. If you lack time, you can turn to a company that offers custom writing service for students but we are sure that after reading this post you should be able to handle this matter on your own!I also provide links at the end of this guide to resources that you should use in order to search the literature and as you write your review.In addition to using the step-by-step guide that I have provided below, I also recommend that you (a) locate examples of literature reviews in your field of study and skim over these to get a feel for what a literature review is and how these are written (I have also provided links to a couple of examples at the end of these guidelines (b) read over other guides to writing literature reviews so that you see different perspectives and approaches: Some examples are: Read through the links provided below on APA guidelines so that you become familiar with the common core elements of how to write in APA style: in particular, pay attention to general document guidelines (e.g.These guidelines are adapted primarily from Galvan (2006).Galvan outlines a very clear, step-by-step approach that is very useful to use as you write your review.Summarize individual studies or articles with as much or as little detail as each merits according to its comparative importance in the literature, remembering that space (length) denotes significance.Provide the reader with strong “umbrella” sentences at beginnings of paragraphs, “signposts” throughout, and brief “so what” summary sentences at intermediate points in the review to aid in understanding comparisons and analyses.Establish the writer’s reason (point of view) for reviewing the literature; explain the criteria to be used in analyzing and comparing literature and the organization of the review (sequence); and, when necessary, state why certain literature is or is not included (scope).In the body, you should: Group research studies and other types of literature (reviews, theoretical articles, case studies, etc.) according to common denominators such as qualitative versus quantitative approaches, conclusions of authors, specific purpose or objective, chronology, etc.