Tags: Business Continuity Plan Case StudyEssay Paper Writing ServiceDiabetes College EssayMaganda Pa Ang Daigdig Ni Lazaro Fran Book ReportEssay About High School Graduation DaySchool Uniforms Dress Codes EssaySix Steps In Writing An EssayWooden Business Card Holder PlansResearch Papers On Global Warming
In the past, you may have been told that your conclusion should summarize what you have already said by restating your thesis and main points.It is often helpful to restate your argument in the conclusion, particularly in a longer paper, but most professors and instructors want students to go beyond simply repeating what they have already said.
" question—that is, explaining the significance of your basic assertion. " strategy to write your conclusion, you are considering what some of the implications of your argument might be beyond the points already made in your paper.
This strategy allows you to leave readers with an understanding of why your argument is important in a broader context or how it can apply to a larger concept.
Such additional resources could include a new outside source or textual evidence that seemingly contradicts your argument.
For example, consider a paper about Ireland's neutrality during World War II.
For example, consider a paper about alcohol abuse in universities.
If the paper argues that alcohol abuse among students depends more on psychological factors than simply the availability of alcohol on campus, a "so what?Though expectations vary from one discipline to the next, the conclusion of your paper is generally a place to explore the implications of your topic or argument.In other words, the end of your paper is a place to look outward or ahead in order to explain why you made the points you did.Restating your thesis is just a short first part of your conclusion.Make sure that you are not simply repeating yourself; your restated thesis should use new and interesting language.A "posing a new question" conclusion for this paper might ask the historical and cultural reasons for how three separate cultures developed such similar stories with such different themes.To use this strategy, ask yourself, "What new question has developed out of my argument?For example, consider a paper about an apparent correlation between religious belief and support for terrorism.An "addressing limitations" conclusion for this paper might suggest that the apparent correlation relies on the paper's definition of "terrorism" and, since the definition is not objective, the apparent correlation might have been wrongly identified."When you use the "posing a new question" strategy to write your conclusion, you are inviting the reader to consider a new idea or question that has appeared as a result of your argument.For example, consider a paper about three versions of the folktale "Rapunzel." This paper argues that German, Italian, and Filipino versions of "Rapunzel" all vary in terms of characterization, plot development, and moral, and as a result have different themes.