References Research Paper

The reference citation style described here is a version of the "Author, Date" scientific style, adapted from Hansen (1991) and the Council of Biology Editors (1994).Harnack & Kleppinger (2000) have adapted "CBE style" to cite and document online sources.

Effect of providing information about normal test results on patients’ reassurance: randomised controlled trial.There are, however, other reasons for citing references in scientific research papers.Citations to appropriate sources show that you've done your homework and are aware of the background and context into which your work fits, and they help lend validity to your arguments.If your source of information has no individual identifiable author, use the name of the organization to which the work can be attributed in place of the author's name: As New England is located at the convergence of several distinct storm tracks ( we expect to find clear differences in isotopic composition among seasons and potentially among different rain storm events (Fig. Such a source would be omitted from your References Cited or Bibliography section.Your list of References Cited should include all of the references you cited in your paper, and no more!It should be arranged in alphabetical order by the last name of the first author.If you have more than one entry by the same author, they should be further ordered by increasing publication date (more recent papers last).If you have multiple sources from a single author published in the same year, distinguish them both in the in-text citation and in the reference list, by appending the letters a, b, c...(For example: Allen 1996a, 1996b.) You should include enough information that your readers will be able to find these sources on their own.But you also need to cite sources from which you paraphrase or summarize facts or ideas -- whether you've put the fact or idea into your own words or not, you got the fact or idea from somebody else and you need to give them proper acknowledgement (even if an idea might be considered "common knowledge," but you didn't know it until you found it in a particular source).Sources that need to be acknowledged are not limited to books and journal articles, but include internet sites, computer software, written and e-mail correspondence, even verbal conversations with other people (in person or by telephone).