Tags: Tom Brennan Essay IntroductionAn Essay About YourselfBusiness Plan For Sales ManagerOedipus The King Hubris EssayOrganization EssayToo Much Homework For KidsSave Energy Save Nation EssayTo Write An Essay In EnglishForm 4 English EssayHow To Use Problem Solving Skills
Therefore, it should be of interest for scientists to critically analyze current state of the art of OAFR features in order to optimize their scientific quality.At least the diffuse nature of OAFR reviews and critical assessments beg for a book-length discussion to provide an overview of the current state of the art and the future of OAFR, which of course we cannot provide here.
Within the context of the future of organic farming (OF), International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) prepared a strategic paper, Organic 3.0, that includes an extensive debate about the necessary requirements and important research needs in OF (Arbenz et al. Besides that, over the last decade, numerous papers have addressed the following: how OF should be developed in the future; research strategies for OF; the demand, needs, and challenges of OF; analyses of the state of the art in OAFR based on stakeholder and expert interviews, focus group discussions, platforms, or literature reviews (Barabanova et al. When it comes to research features in OAFR, we recognize that the discourse about them is limited and fragmented.The list is not complete, nor without flaws, and we invite readers to reflect on our suggestions and to help extend and refine it.In addition, we reviewed additional literature that is related to the myths.Furthermore, “organic farming” is a prominent topic within the International Farming Systems Association (see Barbier et al.), a community dedicated to foster the application of systems theory in the area of agricultural research, and also a central reference in the discourse on farming systems research in general (Darnhofer et al. However, no comprehensive research about the application of systems theory in OAFR exists so far and our observation is that researchers commonly discuss the need for a systems perspective on OF, but rarely apply systems theory.Based on those observations, we believe that it is important to launch a new discussion about the research characteristics of OAFR. A myth represents an idealistic image of OAFR that conflicts with the research practices and overall conditions of the science daily routines.Similar to Roland Barthes (), we see myths as connotations that present phenomena as natural conditions, when in fact they are socially constructed.The understanding of the organic regulations is that they have to be in line with the IFOAM Principles and consequently the organic farming practices are guided by this ethical framework (see Padel et al.), representing a broad range of actors with rather different worldviews.Organic farmers exclude certain external inputs, focus on the farm internal relations (e.g., between crop rotation and pest management or herd size and on-farm forage production), and try to close nutrient and energy cycles, and the farm is understood as an organism (Raupp ).Here organic products, their processing, trade, and consume is embedded in the regional economy.