The poem is told in what feels like chunks of recollected experiences, quite pell-mell, much like how Monsieur G. The persona in song of myself maintains a duality; he is a flaneur while not being flaneur according to Charles Baudelaire’s definition in The painter of Modern Life. Works Cited Baudelaire, Charles, and Jonathan Mayne. What they wanted, he claims, was to widen the number of subjects they could write about and their century-long debate over the merits of painting and poetry allowed them to do just that.
The poem is told in what feels like chunks of recollected experiences, quite pell-mell, much like how Monsieur G. The persona in song of myself maintains a duality; he is a flaneur while not being flaneur according to Charles Baudelaire’s definition in The painter of Modern Life.Tags: Christian Essays Old TestamentPhotos Of RetrolisthesisSolving Problems With GraphsThe Disappearing Cross Gcse CourseworkReligion Topics For Research PaperHenry Thoreau Civil Disobedience EssayType Of Movies EssayHow To Write An Essay Introduction Paragraph
The foundational treatise on painting by Leon Battista Alberti, published in 1435, is seriously misguided except on the technical aspects of the craft and a brief mention of Narcissus as the legendary inventor of painting.One who is hungry for knowledge and experiences, in constant pursuit of the unknown. These factors, along with others, may force us to perceive the flaneur as a loafer. Even great modern authors though don’t seem to know much about painting including, as our main examples today, Edouard Manet’s close literary friends and supporters in the 19th century: Charles Baudelaire, Emile Zola and Stéphane Mallarmé (above).And they, knowing Manet personally, were in a better position than most. David Carrier questions whether any of those three understood the painter and his works."He [Manet] arranges the figures before him, more or less at random, and then is only interested in getting them down on the canvas as he sees them, with all the vivid contrasts that they make with one another. Charles Baudelaire, whose impact on art history has been greater than the others, was certain that he knew as much about art as painters.Ask nothing else from him than an exactly literal translation. He knows how to paint and that is all…" After those unsuccessful attempts, the honesty with which Gustave Flaubert admitted he understood nothing about Manet’s paintings is rather refreshing. He was brilliant but the fact that he chose an insignificant draughtsman, Constantin Guys, as his main example in And he published the essay in the same year his friend Manet was the talk-of-the-town.The persona in Song of Myself by Walt Whitman teeters on the line of ‘he is flaneur’ versus ‘he is not flaneur’, in accordance with Baudelaire’s definition that is. Whitman’s persona in Song of Myself undoubtedly has an abundance of experiences to share, and is therefore indeed an observer of the world; a man of the world, but whether he has pursued these experiences with the attitude, curiosity and hunger characteristic of a flaneur or merely had them by means of existing hinders his qualification to be flaneur. Much of the definition being communicated through the behavior and characteristics of his main character Monsieur G. Not that the artists are more insightful when they themselves write but that’s a topic for another post.In a nut shell, the word ‘flaneur’ can be simply described as ‘an idle man-about-town’ (Flaneur) or a type of loafer.