For example, consider a paper about alcohol abuse in universities.
If the paper argues that alcohol abuse among students depends more on psychological factors than simply the availability of alcohol on campus, a "so what?
For example, consider a paper about an apparent correlation between religious belief and support for terrorism.
An "addressing limitations" conclusion for this paper might suggest that the apparent correlation relies on the paper's definition of "terrorism" and, since the definition is not objective, the apparent correlation might have been wrongly identified.
Restating your thesis is just a short first part of your conclusion.
Make sure that you are not simply repeating yourself; your restated thesis should use new and interesting language.This page lists some of the stages involved in writing a library-based research paper.Although this list suggests that there is a simple, linear process to writing such a paper, the actual process of writing a research paper is often a messy and recursive one, so please use this outline as a flexible guide.Though expectations vary from one discipline to the next, the conclusion of your paper is generally a place to explore the implications of your topic or argument.In other words, the end of your paper is a place to look outward or ahead in order to explain why you made the points you did.To use this strategy, ask yourself, "Is there any evidence against my thesis?" or "What does an outside source have to say about my thesis?"When you use the "addressing limitations" strategy to write your conclusion, you are discussing the possible weaknesses of your argument and, thus, the fallibility of your overall conclusion.This strategy is often useful in concluding papers on scientific studies and experiments.Such additional resources could include a new outside source or textual evidence that seemingly contradicts your argument.For example, consider a paper about Ireland's neutrality during World War II.